Saturday, September 24, 2016

Egypt Imports of Liquefied Natural Gas

Egypt, the most populous Arab country, is seeking about 120 LNG (liquefied natural gas) cargoes for 2017, worth about $2.4 billion at current spot prices in Singapore. But this giant tender is done under the shadow of the discovery of a huge natural gas field in the Mediterranean would provide massive supply of feedstock to Egypt in the near future. The Zohr natural gas prospect discovered in 2015 could hold a potential 30 trillion cubic feet of natural gas; the field is located in the in Mediterranean Sea about 190km off the Egyptian coast and is the country’s energy sector's crown jewel. Egypt hopes to become the center of regional natural gas development. However, Egypt’s new gas discovery will not cover energy needs in the next four years, as the preparation of the new gas discovery’s full infrastructure may take five to six years.

Natural gas has become a vital resource for the Egyptian economy. Electricity consumption amounted to 62 per cent of the domestic production of gas, while the industrial sector consumption reached 23 per cent, homes and car fuel five per cents and oil derivatives 10 per cent. If in the year 2000 gas provided 35 percent of the total energy needs of the country, now it’s more than half. But the Zohr project is questioned by the price fundamentals of natural gas. LNG imports became attractive for nations such as Egypt after prices fell 61 percent over the past two years. This are enhanced mainly by two factors. Demand has been reduced by Japan, which had become one of the world’s largest LNG consumers after its Fukushima disaster, because it recently began restarting its nuclear reactors. There is an increased supply capacity coming online around the world that is likely to put further pressure on prices.


In any case, Egypt has chosen three firms to supply liquefied natural gas to its markets for the remainder of 2016: giant Glencore, an Anglo-Swiss commodities trading house, will supply cargo for October; Dutch Trafigura (the third-largest oil and metals trader in the world) will deliver a shipment for November; and U.K.-based B.B. Energy – a relatively new player in the LNG trade – will ship in December.

Monday, September 19, 2016

Yemen: the dangers of economic implosion

War, a high population growth rate, high unemployment, declining water resources, and severe food scarcity is leading Yemen to a bleak future for which is already the poorest country in the Middle East.

The country is infested by military activity that is harming its infrastructure and the access to all type of goods. For example, the Port of al-Hudaydah, which handles 60% of Yemen’s commercial traffic, was damaged in August 2015, its four cranes were destroyed and several warehouses were damaged, and it was operating at only half of its capacity.

The country has currently over 27 million inhabitants, 0.8 million are born each year, and the population is forecasted to reach about 33 million in 2025. Analysts have pointed out that at any given time almost 1 in 5 women is pregnant and nearly half of the population is under 15 years old.

Unemployment was of about 17-18% high.

Groundwater levels have been falling and Sanaa could be the first capital city in the world to run dry.

Scarce food resources caused a third of Yemenis facing chronic hunger even before the unrest. That number is growing quickly.


The not encouraging economic situation has to overcome war and the hindrance of tribalism. These seem to be the main impediments to the betterment of the Yemenite society, but they do not seem easy to toss away, at least in the near future.

Sunday, September 18, 2016

Morocco’s economy and OCP

Office Chérifien de Phosphates (OCP) — Morocco’s state owned phosphate producer and world’s leading exporter is a key factor in the Moroccan economy as it contributes more than 4 percent to the country’s GDP.

OCP is the second world’s largest producer of phosphate rock (the Chinese are the first) and ranks fifth among the main phosphoric acid makers, and had close to 8 million tonnes of granulation capacity in 2015.

Looking at the company’s activity, it is interesting to observe that on one hand since 2011 they have engaged into a massive multi-billion dollar expansion and modernization plan, but on the other OCP is currently receiving 40% less for its output than it did four years ago.




Between 2016 and 2020, OCP plans to commission four phosphate complexes, each with a one million tonnes granulation capacity, at its Jorf Phosphate Hub. In early 2016, OCP announced the project for a one million tonnes granulation facility in Phosboucraa, in the political disputed Western Sahara, for completion in 2020. A key element in OCP’s plans to expand its phosphate rock mining capacity from 30 million to 55 million mt/y has been the construction of the 187km long pipeline from Khourigba, inland, to the port and fertilizer production complex at Jorf Lasfar. Capable of handling 38 million mt/y of phosphate rock slurry, the pipeline has cut the company’s logistics costs by 90% while saving some 3 million m3 of water a year.

OCP accounts for some 28% of global phosphate exports in all forms, with mining capacities in excess of 32 million tonnes p.a. The company plans to expand its mining capacity over the next ten years, with the objective of reaching an effective capacity of 55 Mt in the longer term. Expansions are taken place in the main mining centers of Khouribga and Gantour. In the long term, the company will open new mines on the Meskala deposit (Essaouira Region), to feed downstream capacity projects at its Safi Phosphate Hub. A key feature of these projects is the expansion of floatation capacity, allowing OCP to further extract and process lower grades of phosphate ore. The bulk of the projected increase in production of phosphate concentrates would be earmarked for captive uses at OCP various Hubs. It has been reported that OCP plans to increase its phosphoric acid capacity from its current 4.7 millions of tonnes of P205 to 7.8 million in 2020.







Saturday, September 17, 2016

The problematic current ceasefire in Syria

The Syria ceasefire agreement was signed by the United States and Russia but its implementation has to overcome the mosaic of conflicting interests in the framework of a cruel war that already claimed more than 300 thousand dead, more than two millions wounded, and drive more than half of the country's citizens away from their homes.

The main victim of the Syrian war has been the notion of a Syrian nation, if there ever was one.

The Damascus ruling Alawites are a 12-13% minority, but they level their numeric inferiority with the support of the Shiite camp, led by Iran with the involvement of its proxy Hezbollah, and the backing and military aid on the ground from Russia. The Alawites were originally known as the "Nusayris," and became established along the Mediterranean coast under the Shiite Hamdanid dynasty. The French colonial regime favored the Alawites in order to balance power against the majority Sunnis and their Ottoman backers. In the present situation, the term "the Assad regime" no longer refers to a state's regime but to this ethnic group controlling certain areas across what used to be Syria.

The Sunni Arabs of Syria constitute about 60% of the population but are divided into dozens of militias, few of which are jihadist (like ISIS, Jabhat Fateh al-Sham and others), that receive support from the Gulf states, led by Saudi Arabia, and recently from the US as well.

The Kurds in northern Syria, constitute about 9% of the population, or approximately 1.6 million people, and are fighting the Islamic State, but oppose the regime as well. They are supported today by the US and other Western states, but are attacked by Turkey, which sees a Kurdish autonomy in northern Syria as a threat to its interests.

In what makes up to the foreign forces, the US is interested in seeing in Syria a moderate Sunni regime leaning towards the West, but, due to the Obama’s administration policy of neo-isolationism, has so far hesitated to put any significant effort into that task. Russia supports the continued existence of an Alawite minority regime for fear that the alternative would lead to Moscow losing its foothold on the ground. Turkey would like to see a Sunni regime in Damascus, but is busy fighting the Kurds. That is the reason why Recep Tayyip Erdogan's regime supported ISIS for such a long time and allowed jihadists from around the world to flock to Syria so that they would join the war and strike the Kurds. Israel does whatever it can to keep itself out of the conflict but for humanitarian medical help and military responses to any fire on Israeli territory, including accidental fire.


This mosaic of opposing interests makes not only difficult the complete implementation of the ceasefire, but poses also serious problems in Syria’s long term future. The concept of a Syrian Homeland – Watan - was first convened in the late 19th century by a group of Christian-Arab intellectuals, headed by Butrus al-Bastani. He was born in 1819 of a Lebanese Maronite Christian family in the village of Dibbiye in the Chouf region, Lebanon. But, divided among different ethnic and religious groups, the idea of a Syrian nation seems something not to be accomplished in the near future. The division of what once was Syria into different emirates or ethnic enclaves is not necessarily a danger, but could be a pragmatic solution.

Thursday, September 15, 2016